Mar 30, 2011

Black Star Co-Op Pub and Brewery

Author's note: This story was originally written for BeerAdvocate Magazine. However, I was unaware that a From The Source (my monthly column in the mag) had already been written on Black Star (it was written before the column was mine, all mine). In order to not let a piece of hard work go to waste, I've published it on my oft neglected blog.

Perhaps the most common expression amongst brewers is that they brew the kind of beer that they want to drink. At the Black Star Co-op Pub and Brewery, it’s the other way around. They brew the beer that you want to drink.

Then again, they do a lot of things a little bit differently at Black Star, located in the Midtown Commons area of Austin, Texas. As one of the country’s few co-op breweries, Black Star’s first priority is to serve its customers – many of whom own stock in the company.

Other People’s Property
Steven Yarak is the founder of the 10-bbl brew pub, but there is no individual owner. He owns as much as brewer Jeff Young, and 1,000 other people around the country.

“It’s kind of like a corporation, kind of like an enormous partnership,” Yarak explained. “The main difference is that generally everyone owns one share of commons hop. You can’t come in and say I want to buy 1,000 shares of stock – you get one. You have one the same as everyone else does.”

That explains what the co-op is, but it doesn’t explain why it came to be. For an answer to that question, Yarak recalls the first meeting of Yarak and some of the area’s homebrewers in January, 2006 in which he proposed a community-owned pub that would give people in Austin a locally-owned place to drink.

“Austin has some good beer bars, but most of them don’t have many roots in the community. Even the local college bars generally have absentee ownership, or are owned by larger regional restaurant groups,” Yarak said. “You go there have a pint, maybe a meal, and your money is buying a new yacht for some guy in California. What we have done is closed the loop. The money you stay here stays in the community whether it’s buying pork from Richardson farms, paying our workers a living wage, or patronage refunds.”

Yarak’s vision was met with support from the community – possibly sold by the idea of “patronage refunds,” which redistribute profits at the end of the year to its members based on the amount of beer they purchased.

“What that means is everyone has equal opportunity to participate,” Yarak said. “We return the profits based on the percentage of your participation, not your ownership.”

Soon work was underway to boost membership, gain capital and start the process of building the brew pub.
By the end of that year the co-op had its first general meeting, and by 2010 Black Star opened in downtown Austin.

“We started more from our principals, and said: ‘If we are going to build something, what would it look like?’ And this is what it came up with,” Yarak said.

It was a long process to be sure, but the result was something that the member-owners could be proud of with English pub fare, locally-grown food and a solid beer lineup that includes 4-6 house beers and 20 guest taps.

“We love doing what we do, but we know there is a lot of other people out there who do great things as well,” Yarak said. “We want to highlight our local producers as well.
“[There are] lots of up and coming breweries here in Austin. We started with fewer [guest taps] in the plans, but as more and more breweries started to open we added more.”

An Easy Decision
Yarak’s original vision was for a Belgian-style cafĂ© in Texas. It was Young who first proposed that the bar should make its own beer. A homebrewer and chemist, Young was fresh from the homebrewer’s hell that was Alabama and was looking to get in on a brewpub in Texas.

“He argued passionately, both verbally and with product in hand, that the enterprise should be a brew pub as well,” Yarak said.

Young’s beer was good enough to change Yarak’s mind, and he has been head of brewing operations at Black Star ever since it got its 10-bbl system from Premier Stainless. However, Young isn’t the only one making the decisions with regard to the brewing. Through tasting panels and member meetings, the co-op collectively decides what beers to brew.

A bit of a math geek, Young brews two types of beer – “Rational,” and “Irrational.” While most of Black Star’s house beers come from Young’s own recipes, there is a lot of room with which to play in the Irrational series.

“One thing that we want to do, haven’t gotten to yet but we might get to it in the spring – is to have a forum for people to come up with a beer that is just a theory. For example somebody might say: ‘I think we should make a porter fermented with Trappist Ale yeast and lets add pears to it’ something along those lines, and the forum would come up with a bear with that level of detail, and Jeff will try to make that into reality and brew it,” Yarak said. “Then we’ll have a release and see how it works out.”

Split Personalities
Black Star doesn’t do “normal” beers. Yarak points out that so many breweries make great examples of classic styles, and that there is no shame in admitting that you can’t make a better beer in the same style.

“We don’t’ want to do the things that are standard,” Yarak said. “We want to play with it, but at the end of the day it has to be drinkable. It has to be something that you would want to come back for.”

At Black Star, that translates to beers like Vulcan. Akin to an IPA, Vulcan is brewed with rye malt and copious amounts of hops. Weighing in at 6.5% ABV and with an aggressive hop profile, the beer is able to blur the lines a bit of what the IPA style is. For those who don’t like it, there are the guest taps.

“We don’t feel the need to just make an IPA because there’s plenty of great IPAs out there,” Yarak said. “We are able to experiment more with our house beers.”

Although Vulcan falls under the Rational category at Black Star, most of the real experimentation is done in the Irrational series of seasonals and experiments. There is Waterloo – which is similar to a Berliner Weisse and is brewed with Texas Country Peaches when they are in season early summer.

There are also the occasional wild ales, or barrel-aged products and, at some point in the future, beers designed by the members. However, Yarak doesn’t want the beers to get too far from the norm.

“I think the American craft beer movement has overcome the extreme,” Yarak said. “The ones who pulled it off definitely had an incredible product that I enjoy drinking from time to time, but it wasn’t the sort of thing that makes me want to come back and be a regular.”

Ultimately, it is all about the regulars. The beer and the food are key components of the brew pub, but the most important piece of the co-op is the people. They are the customers, owners, and brewers, and together they have created a truly unique operation with its roots firmly planted in the community.

Jun 14, 2010

Homebrew Competition

For a while now I have felt that my strawberry Hefeweizen was pretty damn good. In fact, I feel like it's probably the best beer that I make. It's better than my California Common (or Both Coasts Common if I want to throw in the "official name."), and it's certainly better than the rest of my more experimental beers. However, I get tired of it after too long, and am ready for something with a bit more of a hop bite or malt backbone as time goes on. Add in that it's my most expensive beer to make (thanks to 10 pounds of strawberries) and i tend to make it about once a summer.

Don't get me wrong - I like this beer enough and am confident enough that I decided to enter it into a homebrew competition. This particular comp was the first of its kind at Gordon's Wine and Liquor in Waltham, and it went off pretty well.  There were 26 official entries, with a few extra thrown in at the last minute (I think 30 in total), and it took place in their rather classy "Culinary Center" located in the back of the store.

I had the "honor" of going first, as the staff poured my beer first to the three judges (a mixture of industry professionals, including one each from breweries Harpoon and Clown Shoes, and a third from a distributor that I cannot recall) and then to the rest of the crowd (Between 30 and 40 people). It seemed to go over well, and the judges suggested three areas for improvement - a creamier body, and a little more hop bitterness. The third judge (Ray, the distributor) mentioned that the brewer (me) must love strawberry-banana smoothies (exactly how I describe the beer to friends), because that's what he tasted.

As to those comments, I respect the opinions, but I also understand that they were coming from a place of personal preference. After the competition, all of the judges were complimentary of the beer and didn't seem shocked when it won second place overall (oh yeah, I won second place. I'll take it!). So with all due respect, I think I'll keep the recipe the way it is now.

After my beer, the competition went well and was a ton of fun. Some highlights included the winner (a double IPA with only summit hops), and a dry stout that wowed the judges, myself, and everyone sitting next to me (somehow this didn't place in the top three). The event also featured an incredible Tripel, and a couple of tasty Imperial Stouts as well that all could have justifiably beaten my beer.

But not all was honky dory - as one of the late entrants had a few surprises in for us. The brewer - clad in bike shorts, a tight t-shirt, and green plastic eyeglasses (to be fair he did ride his bike there) - introduced his beer by saying "If you really like tart cherries, then you'll like this beer. If you don't, then you're wrong." It was a tongue-in-cheek comment to be sure, but at the same time it points to the lunacy of the situation to unfold. The beer looked fine, even had a nice oud bruin brown color to it. However, as soon as I put my nose to it I had to take a step back. I asked the brewer what style it was, and he answered: "Whatever style uses 12 different strains of yeast." OK. That explained a lot actually.

The damn thing smelled like my kitchen, the part close to the cat box, right after my cat has a big meal. It tasted alright, with a funky and well-balanced sweetness to counteract the sour, but damn it smelled like cat-shit.

Then, the same wacky brewer had a beer called "sour time." Along the same lines of the first, this was a wild wild wild brew, and this one was beyond redeemable. Not only did it smell and taste awful (Bleach and metal cleaner come to mind), but it looked hideous with a slightly yellow head on top of a sickly tinted amber liquid. This was the last beer of the competition, and three hours later I can still taste it.

So overall, it was a great experience, and as a reward for second prize I won a pound of hops. However, considering I had to essentially drink toilet cleaner at the end of the night, I'm not sure it was worth it.

For those interested, I've posted the recipe below. If anybody has any ideas what hops I should get with my prize, let me know.

1.00 lb Rice Hulls (0.0 SRM) Adjunct 9.52 %
5.00 lb Pale Malt (2 Row) US (2.0 SRM) Grain 47.62 %
4.50 lb Wheat Malt, Ger (2.0 SRM) Grain 42.86 %
1.00 oz Hallertauer [4.80 %] (60 min) Hops 17.6 IBU
1 Pkgs Weihenstephan Weizen (Wyeast Labs #3068) Yeast-Wheat

10 lb strawberries - secondary fermentation - 7 days

Jun 3, 2010

NBA Finals Preview

I have managed to continue my trend of sporadic posting. I have been far too busy with graduation and graduation parties to take the time to ruminate about my two favorite subjects, but I'm back today to discuss the NBA Finals and the rematch of the Boston Celtics and Los Angeles Lakers.

I'm not going to go into detail about the rivalry, mostly because I'm too young to remember the 80's and Bob Ryan does a much better job of it than I could ever do (If all of the popup ads generated by Boston.com aren't a sign of the desperation of newspapers these days then I don't know what is). So let's already assume that this series will be great even if all it does is add another chapter to an incredible story. Instead, I want to focus on some of the key matchups (all of them) that will play a role in this series.

Pau Gasol vs. Kevin Garnett
I'm not the first writer to say this, and for good reason. If Gasol can have his way with Garnett and his limpy knees, then the Lakers should have a marked advantage in this series. However, if Garnett is able to fluster the seven-foot Spaniard, then the Celtics have the advantage down low. Any team that can get an advantage in the post against the Lakers has already accomplished a major task. For this reason, this matchup becomes the most important. It will also have ramifications on the next matchup as well.

Andrew Bynum vs. Kendrick Perkins
The Lakers were without their starting center in 2008 when Boston humiliated them in a six-game romp that featured one incredible comeback and one embarrassing blowout. If Bynum is to prove that he would have been a difference-maker in the '08 series, then he must find ways to score against one of the League's premier defensive centers. Ten points and 10 boards for either of these players will be a major accomplishment, as they attempt to neutralize the other's offensive production.

For both big men, the key will most likely be who can stay out of foul trouble. Both are prone to riding the bench with too many fouls early in the game, and that could spell problems for either team. Essentially, the longer Bynum stays in the game, the longer Garnett has to guard Gasol. How much punishment will KG be able to take at his age and on his knees from Pau? Meanwhile, if Bynum is out of the game, the Celtics will be able to punish Garnett with a series of defenders that include the tenacious Perkins, Garnett, and the reanimated corpse of Rasheed Wallace.

Kobe Bryant vs. Every Celtic
Ask Dwayne Wade, LeBron James, or Vince Carter (ask nicely if you talk to Vince, he's sensitive) - they will tell you how tricky it can be to attack the basket against the Celtics. Perimeter players are rarely afforded the opportunity to go one-on-one, instead they often face double or triple teams as soon as they attempt to dribble-drive into the paint. (For a better description of the Celtics' defense, check out this post on the worldwide leader - Los Angeles) Can you think of a more ideal situation for the one player who loves to go one-on-five? If Kobe continues to sink ridiculous shots like he did against Phoenix, then the Celtics will be in trouble. However, if Boston can force Kobe into jacking up 30 or so shots to get 25-or-so points, then that's good news for the Green.

Rajon Rondo vs. Kobe Bryant
Meanwhile, expect Kobe to play rover defense off of Rondo. Rondo may have taken about 10,000 steps forward in his abilities, but he still can't knock down the three-pointer. Expect Phil Jackson to come out with Kobe on Rondo, and expect Kobe to play the passing lanes rather than respect Rondo as a shooter. If the Celtics point-star is able to punish Bryant and the Lakers with his quick drives to the basket or some timely shooting, then the Celtics have an edge here. However, Rondo still struggles from the free throw line and the Lakers won't be shy to knock him on his ass and send him to the line for two every time he comes into the paint (at least this is what they should do). How much punishment and embarrassment at the free-throw line will Rondo take before he settles into a slightly more controlled and passive role?

Ron Artest vs. Paul Pierce
Like Bynum's presence, Ron Ron's face is new to this heated rivalry that was first reignited in 2008. No Laker fan will ever forget Paul Pierce and the Wheelchair game . Ron Artest was born to defend sluggish scorers like Paul Pierce, who could easily become frustrated by the Queensbridge-repping forward's grab-happy hands and dedication to his craft.

However, the real key to this matchup will be what Pierce is able to do against Artest. Although, Artest is a streaky shooter at best, he is still a capable offensive player. Completely forgetting about him on the perimeter is an easy way to give up a quick 15 points. If Artest can make Pierce work on both ends of the floor, then he has earned his role on the squad and the comparisons to Trevor Ariza can finally rest. However, if Pierce is able to elevate his game in the face of a tough competitor like Artest, then the Celtics will have a distinct leg up. Pierce, like all great scorers, is an underrated playmaker, and when he is able to get his shot off, his teammates benefit from the attention he draws from the defense. A good game from pierce and any other Celtic could put the Lakers in danger.

Ray Allen vs. Derek Fisher
I didn't mention Ray when talking about guarding Kobe because he will have tons of help, and won't be guarding him on an island. However, the same won't be true of Fisher, who will have to chase Allen around screens and battle with the taller guard in the post. Everything about this matchup screams advantage for the Celtics, but Ray Allen has to be the driving force. Taking Fisher onto the block may be a bad idea, as he is incredibly tough and has a strong body. Boston's best bet is to wear down LA's second-best clutch shooter by making him chase the league's premier shooter coming off the curl. LA's best chance at gaining any advantage from this advantage will be if Fisher is able to create turnovers by selling some moving-screens on Boston's big men.

Lamar Odom vs. Rasheed Wallace (or bench vs. bench)
Neither team has had consistent bench production over the course of the regular season and playoffs, but Boston seems to have a slight edge here with bigs like Wallace and Glen Davis to body up the Lakers' massive front line. However, "Kobe-stopper" James Posey is missing from this roster, as is Stephon Marbury and his head tattoo (actually, that's a good thing for Boston). The bench may be the most pivotal matchup of all in this series, especially if Perkins decides to blow up at a referee and earn himself a one-game suspension from his seventh playoff foul.

Prediction
I've got to go with the Lakers in seven, but mainly because I'm a Laker's fan and that's how I want it to end up. Both teams are so evenly matched, that a close call, a lucky bounce, an injury, or a suspension could completely turn the series. With homecourt advantage and the game's best player, the Lakers have a slight advantage, but only slight.

May 10, 2010

Does Rajon Rondo even like playing basketball?

Rondo cracks me up. The kid can ball on the level of the best point guards in the game, has freakishly long arms and big hands, and can do everything except shoot a long jumper. He's an all-around beast that any team would gladly take at the one, and the funniest thing is that he never even cracks a smile. The dude's all business. Just look at this interview - I love the last question: "Do you take it as a compliment that Lebron wants to guard you?" "You can say that if you want to."

May 9, 2010

Brew Day - Strawberry Hefeweizen

It's a good day for brewing, so I'm brewing up an early summer favorite - Strawberry Hefeweizen. The recipe itself is simple enough:

1.00 lb Rice Hulls (0.0 SRM) Adjunct 9.52 %
5.00 lb Pale Malt (2 Row) US (2.0 SRM) Grain 47.62 %
4.50 lb Wheat Malt, Ger (2.0 SRM) Grain 42.86 %
1.00 oz Hallertauer [4.80 %] (60 min) Hops 17.6 IBU
1 Pkgs Weihenstephan Weizen (Wyeast Labs #3068) Yeast-Wheat

But the real beauty of this beer is the 10 pounds of strawberries that get added to the beer a few days into fermentation.

Wyeast 3068 is known to kick off a lot of esthers (smells), particularly a compound that smells like bananas. Typically the warmer the fermentation temperature, the more esthers. Also, not adding enough yeast can add to esther production. If this were a normal hefeweizen, I'd like to keep those esthers somewhat under control, but this isn't a normal hefeweizen. I like to kick it old school with this brew and just leave the fermenting beer in a dark, cool corner of my apartment, which is about 65 degrees or so these days. That keeps the beer around 72-74 degrees and keeps those banana esthers popping out. The strawberries get dumped into the same bucket a few days later.

The banana smell really blends nicely with the aroma of the strawberries, and almost gives it a milk-shake like smell. However, the smell is a little misleading, as the beer is actually more tart than sweet. All of the sugar ferments out of the berries during fermentation, and all that's left is a tart fruitiness. Coupled with a high level of carbonation when it comes time for that, this ends up being a very dry beer perfect for warm summer days. I'm excited for it already.

On deck for tomorrow's brew day - Black Gold IPA:

10.00 lb Pale Malt (2 Row) US (2.0 SRM) Grain 81.63 %
1.00 lb Caramel/Crystal Malt - 20L (20.0 SRM) Grain 8.16 %
0.50 lb Chocolate Malt (350.0 SRM) Grain 4.08 %
0.50 lb Munich Malt (9.0 SRM) Grain 4.08 %
0.25 lb Black (Patent) Malt (500.0 SRM) Grain 2.04 %
3.00 oz Cascade [8.00 %] (Dry Hop 7 days) Hops -
3.00 oz Goldings, B.C. [5.00 %] (60 min) Hops 50.7 IBU
2.00 oz Goldings, East Kent [5.00 %] (60 min) Hops 33.8 IBU
1.00 oz Goldings, East Kent [5.00 %] (First Wort Hop) Hops 16.9 IBU
1 Pkgs American Ale (Wyeast Labs #1056) Yeast-Ale